Reinier Russell

managing partner

Reinier advises national and international companies

reinier.russell@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Right of inquiry: What are inquiry proceedings?

Publication date 13 March 2024

Within a company, disputes regularly arise between shareholders and/or directors. This can create situations that endanger the company. To resolve such problems, inquiry proceedings were created in the Netherlands. What do these proceedings entail?

expert - social media

Inquiry proceedings are special proceedings that focus on disputes within companies. Examples include a conflict between shareholders or between shareholders and directors. These proceedings can only be commenced before the Enterprise Chamber at the Amsterdam Court of Appeal (Ondernemingskamer). These cases involve an investigation (the inquiry) into the affairs and policy within a company. The aim of inquiry proceedings is a sustainable restoration of relations and relationships within a company.

The Enterprise Chamber and inquiry proceedings are generally associated with complex investigations into large listed companies. However, even for smaller companies, inquiry proceedings can be an effective way to resolve conflicts in cooperation between parties. This is because the Enterprise Chamber has and uses many powers in theses proceedings. For example, the Enterprise Chamber can choose to appoint and dismiss directors or annul decisions taken by the company. Moreover, these decisions can be taken quickly by the Enterprise Chamber. This makes inquiry proceedings not only effective, but also very efficient.

Phases of the inquiry proceedings

Inquiry proceedings consists of two stages. During the first stage, a request is submitted to the Enterprise Chamber to investigate the policy and affairs of the company. The law determines who can file such a request. You can read more about this in another blog.

First stage: investigation

Before a request for investigation can be submitted, a number of conditions must be met. For instance, the applicant must first have made the objections known in writing to the management and, if present, to the supervisory body (Supervisory Board, Advisory Board, etc.). Afterwards, the applicant must allow a reasonable period of time, thus giving them the opportunity to respond to objections and possibly take action. Only if this does not remove the objections can the applicant turn to the Enterprise Chamber. If the applicant does not take these steps first, their request will be declared inadmissible.

After filing the request, the Enterprise Chamber gives the interested parties in the proceedings an opportunity to defend themselves against the inquiry request. An oral hearing is often held in which the parties can explain their position to the court.

If the Enterprise Chamber is of the opinion that there are “well-founded reasons to doubt a correct policy”, it orders an investigation. An investigator will then be appointed who is entitled to inspect all the company’s records. After the investigation, the investigator issues a report. This completes the first stage.

During this first stage, the Enterprise Chamber can already make immediate provisions in urgent cases, for the duration of the proceedings. For example, it can suspend or dismiss directors, or temporarily deprive shareholders of their voting rights and even appoint a replacement director and/or share manager. It is even possible for the Enterprise Chamber to decide to postpone conducting the investigation and wait to see whether the provisional measures are already sufficient to resolve the conflict.

Second stage: mismanagement

When the investigation report is finalized and it shows mismanagement, the applicant can request the Enterprise Chamber to make provisions. These could include the annulment of (management) decisions, the deviation from the articles of association, dismissal of directors or, in extreme cases, even the dissolution of the legal entity. In addition, the finding of mismanagement can be used in other (already ongoing) proceedings. For example, to prove directors’ liability.

Corporate litigation lawyer

Would you like to learn more about the right of inquiry? Do you have any other questions concerning corporate law and corporate litigation? Please contact us:

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    Immediate measures in inquiry proceedings

    A key advantage of inquiry proceedings is that that these allow the court to quickly make provisions to protect the company. What measures can the Enterprise Chamber take?

    Read more

    Conflict with my fellow shareholder- what to do?

    A dispute between shareholders can lead to problems within the company. In the case of a 50/50 shareholding, it may even make decision-making impossible and, in the worst case, threaten the survival of the company. How is such a dispute resolved?

    Read more

    Using general terms and conditions

    The use of general terms and conditions is something companies can no longer do without. Contracting parties refer to their own general terms and conditions in small print, often containing favorable clauses for their own benefit. But what is the power of general terms and conditions? And what should be considered when using them?

    Read more

    An inclusive holiday policy

    The holiday season is approaching, a time of joy and days off for many. However, not everyone finds these holidays equally meaningful.

    Read more

    25 September 2024: Cybersecurity and Data Protection in Litigation

    Wednesday 25 September 2024, Reinier Russell will discuss cybersecurity and data protection in litigation at the European meeting of the World Litigation Forum in Barcelona.

    Read more

    Right of inquiry: when is a request for an inquiry granted?

    Before the Enterprise Chamber can grant a request for an inquiry, there must be well-founded reasons to doubt the correct policy or course of events within a company. When is this the case?

    Read more