Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Since 1 June 2022, new rules apply to distribution agreements. What are the most important changes for suppliers and distributors?
Agreements between undertakings that restrict competition are prohibited: the cartel ban. The prohibition also applies to manufacturers/suppliers who want to make arrangements with their distributors. Because of the cartel ban, you cannot just agree upon anything in distribution agreements. A well-known example of a prohibited arrangement in distribution agreements is the imposition of a fixed resale price. The resale price is the price at which distributors resell the products or services to their customers.
Some arrangements are exempted from the cartel ban, as their positive effects outweigh the negative effects (under competition law). These exemptions were previously included in the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER). However, on 1 June 2022, the revised VBER entered into force. The revised VBER includes several new rules for suppliers and distributors. The four most important changes will be discussed in the following.
Dual distribution exists if suppliers not only sell their goods or services via independent distributors but are also active in retail trade. Due to the growth of online sales (web shops) the phenomenon of dual distribution has increased significantly.
In the case of dual distribution, the supplier competes at retail level directly with independent distributors. A distribution agreement concluded between a supplier who distributes dually may raise competition law concerns. Especially where exchange of competitive information between the supplier and the independent distributors is concerned. After all, due to the information exchange, a supplier who is also active at retail level and a distributor may form a “block” to direct market conduct. In this way, they may restrict competition at retail level.
In the revised VBER, the rules for dual distribution have been tightened. Dual distribution is still allowed if the joint market share of the parties is a maximum of 10%. In that case, information exchange between supplier and distributor will be exempted from the cartel ban. If the market share exceeds 10% but is less than 30%, dual distribution will still be permitted. However, in that case stricter rules apply to the extent of the information exchanged between the parties: The information exchange is only exempted from the cartel ban if it is directly connected with the execution of the distribution agreement and necessary to improve the production and distribution of products.
There will be more room for suppliers and distributors to charge a higher rate for products that are sold online than the rate for products in offline sales (dual pricing). However, the price difference must be traceable to a difference in the costs incurred per sales channel. In addition, the objective of the price difference may not be to restrict online sales by the distributor.
The revised VBER prohibits all arrangements in distribution agreements with the objective to prohibit online sales. Also prohibited is any restriction that (effectively) prevents customers from using the internet to sell their products or services online. Some restrictions of online sales are still permitted, though. For example, suppliers can prohibit their distributors from selling goods via online market places and may require that distributors who want to sell online also have a physical shop or workshop for the sale of the products concerned.
The revised VBER provides more flexibility in exclusive distribution systems: From now on suppliers can designate a maximum of five distributors for one customer group or one territory. In addition, the revised VBER makes it easier to maintain different distribution systems alongside. Thus, distributors (and their customers) can be prohibited from actively selling in territories where the supplier applies an exclusive system. In addition, distributors (and their customers) can be prohibited from actively and passively selling to unauthorized distributors in territories where the supplier applies a selective system. As a result, suppliers are better able to set up closed distribution networks.
Distribution agreements that were effective on 31 May 2022 (and are continuing), may contain provisions that are not in line with the revised VBER. No worries: These agreements are still exempted from the cartel ban until 31 May 2023. It is important, however, to have checked in time whether your distribution agreements are in line with the revised VBER.
Do you have any questions about the revised VBER? Or do you need assistance with setting up your distribution agreements in line with competition law?
We will be happy to help you.
Please contact:
The shareholders’ agreement is the most important agreement entered into between shareholders and the company. What matters should you cover in this agreement?
The use of general terms and conditions is something companies can no longer do without. Contracting parties refer to their own general terms and conditions in small print, often containing favorable clauses for their own benefit. But what is the power of general terms and conditions? And what should be considered when using them?
Expedited liquidation is a quick way to terminate a legal entity. However, the scheme was also abused, disadvantaging creditors. A new law should prevent this. What requirements does an expedited liquidation have to meet from now on? And what options do creditors have to collect their claims?
Entrepreneurs may have various reasons for ending their businesses. Expected profits may be disappointing, retirement may be approaching or a partnership (joint venture) may be ending. What should entrepreneurs bear in mind when terminating a business?
In principle, the enforcement of foreign judgments is a national matter. But what if a dispute has already been dealt with by a foreign court? Can such a foreign judgment be enforced in the Netherlands or not?
An African mask that was sold for 150 euros fetched 4.2 million euros at an auction. Were the French sellers able to undo the sale? How would this case have ended in the Netherlands?
