Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Directors and members of the supervisory board support shareholders in an advisory capacity. From 1 July 2021 this also applies to directors and supervisory board members of associations, foundations and cooperatives. What are the consequences if the shareholders make decisions disregarding this advisory role?
Directors and members of the supervisory board of companies have to be invited to of the general meeting of shareholders. These directors and members of the supervisory board will then not be able to act in their advisory capacity. Disregarding this advisory role can have major consequences.
On 1 July 2021, associations, foundations, cooperatives and mutual benefit associations will also be confronted with this risk. That is when the Management and Supervision of Legal Entities Act will come into force.
To make use of their advisory vote, directors and members of the supervisory board of a BV or NV must always be notified of the general meeting of shareholders. There are no specific requirements for this notification. However, the notification must reach the directors and the members of the supervisory board. In connection with potential burden-of-proof issues, the notification can best be sent by registered letter.
The advisory capacity system cannot be bypassed by any provision in the articles of a BV or NV. The idea behind this regulation is that directors and members of the supervisory board must be able to present their views so that the shareholders can take account of these views in the decision-making process.
In addition to the advisory vote of directors and supervisory board members, there is a duty to be heard. The duty to be heard means that a director or supervisory board member must be heard in a proposed decision of his suspension or dismissal. The reason for this right to be heard is that, according to reasonableness and fairness, the director must have been given the opportunity to defend himself and to present his view on the accusations.
In case the directors or members of the supervisory board have not been able to act in their advisory capacity, a decision by the shareholders may be declared void. If the duty to be heard is not fulfilled, the decision to suspend or dismiss a director or supervisory director is voidable.
In practice, this mainly concerns directors. Some directors have successfully contested their dismissal as they had neither been heard nor invited by the shareholders. The dismissal decision was annulled and the employment contract revived. The company then had to continue paying the director’s salary.
If directors and members of the supervisory board are notified but do not act in their advisory capacity, they won’t be able to declare decisions voidable later. Therefore, it is advisable to always admit directors and members of the supervisory board to the meeting.
Would you like to know more about the general meeting of the shareholders or do you have any other questions regarding the legal position of directors, members of the supervisory board, and shareholders? Please contact:
The holiday season is approaching, a time of joy and days off for many. However, not everyone finds these holidays equally meaningful.
Before the Enterprise Chamber can grant a request for an inquiry, there must be well-founded reasons to doubt the correct policy or course of events within a company. When is this the case?
In an article in the April 2024 issue of Lady Justice, the magazine of the Women Lawyers Section of Primerus, Lisanne Meijerhof shares her passion and expertise in charity law. Why has she chosen to focus on the law of foundations and other philanthropic organizations? What legal issues should charities be aware of?
When tensions run high within a company, potentially putting the company at risk, this may be a reason to go to the Enterprise Chamber to start inquiry proceedings. Who can exercise the right to file an inquiry request?
On the departure of a statutory director/shareholder, any participation in the company must also be settled. Then a discussion may arise about the value of this participation, depending on whether the director counts as a good leaver or bad leaver. What should companies and directors pay attention to when interpreting a leaver arrangement?
Within a company, disputes regularly arise between shareholders and/or directors. This can create situations that endanger the company. To resolve such problems, inquiry proceedings were created in the Netherlands. What do these proceedings entail?