Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Directors and members of the supervisory board support shareholders in an advisory capacity. From 1 July 2021 this also applies to directors and supervisory board members of associations, foundations and cooperatives. What are the consequences if the shareholders make decisions disregarding this advisory role?
Directors and members of the supervisory board of companies have to be invited to of the general meeting of shareholders. These directors and members of the supervisory board will then not be able to act in their advisory capacity. Disregarding this advisory role can have major consequences.
On 1 July 2021, associations, foundations, cooperatives and mutual benefit associations will also be confronted with this risk. That is when the Management and Supervision of Legal Entities Act will come into force.
To make use of their advisory vote, directors and members of the supervisory board of a BV or NV must always be notified of the general meeting of shareholders. There are no specific requirements for this notification. However, the notification must reach the directors and the members of the supervisory board. In connection with potential burden-of-proof issues, the notification can best be sent by registered letter.
The advisory capacity system cannot be bypassed by any provision in the articles of a BV or NV. The idea behind this regulation is that directors and members of the supervisory board must be able to present their views so that the shareholders can take account of these views in the decision-making process.
In addition to the advisory vote of directors and supervisory board members, there is a duty to be heard. The duty to be heard means that a director or supervisory board member must be heard in a proposed decision of his suspension or dismissal. The reason for this right to be heard is that, according to reasonableness and fairness, the director must have been given the opportunity to defend himself and to present his view on the accusations.
In case the directors or members of the supervisory board have not been able to act in their advisory capacity, a decision by the shareholders may be declared void. If the duty to be heard is not fulfilled, the decision to suspend or dismiss a director or supervisory director is voidable.
In practice, this mainly concerns directors. Some directors have successfully contested their dismissal as they had neither been heard nor invited by the shareholders. The dismissal decision was annulled and the employment contract revived. The company then had to continue paying the director’s salary.
If directors and members of the supervisory board are notified but do not act in their advisory capacity, they won’t be able to declare decisions voidable later. Therefore, it is advisable to always admit directors and members of the supervisory board to the meeting.
Would you like to know more about the general meeting of the shareholders or do you have any other questions regarding the legal position of directors, members of the supervisory board, and shareholders? Please contact:
An important part of corporate governance is compliance with the various rules governing the company. How do you ensure that your company becomes and stays compliant?
The shareholders’ agreement is the most important agreement entered into between shareholders and the company. What matters should you cover in this agreement?
It can have major consequences when a body within the company takes a decision it is not authorised to take. What are these consequences and how do you avoid making a decision in the wrong way?
In this blog, we give a brief overview of the main bodies present in limited companies and the powers they have.
A key advantage of inquiry proceedings is that that these allow the court to quickly make provisions to protect the company. What measures can the Enterprise Chamber take?
A dispute between shareholders can lead to problems within the company. In the case of a 50/50 shareholding, it may even make decision-making impossible and, in the worst case, threaten the survival of the company. How is such a dispute resolved?