Reinier Russell

managing partner

Reinier advises national and international companies

reinier.russell@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Good governance: Reasonableness and fairness of directors and supervisors

Publication date 27 August 2015

Reasonableness and fairness play a crucial and special role in Dutch law. What function has this standard, for instance, for directors and supervisors?

corporate governance

Reasonableness and fairness

Pursuant to Book 2, Section 8, subsection 1 of the Dutch Civil Code, a legal person (BV, NV, association, foundation, religious denomination) and those involved in any of these organisations must act according to the principles of reasonableness and fairness.

Reasonableness and fairness is not a concrete standard but will be filled in depending on the circumstances. These factors then play a role:

  • the (social) position of the person(s) concerned within the legal person
  • the sector in which the activities take place
  • the nature of the interests involved in the case
  • previous behaviour shown in similar situations by the legal person
  • the seriousness of the disadvantage suffered by one or more persons concerned

Parties involved in legal persons

Reasonableness and fairness must be taken in into account by the legal person but also by those involved in the legal person, such as directors, shareholders, board of directors, members and works council (by virtue of law) and the supervisory board, depositary receipt holders and appointment committee (according to the Articles).

Limiting effect of the standard

An important application of the standard is set out in Book 2, Article 8, subsection 2 of the Dutch Civil Code, according to which among the parties involved in legal persons by virtue of law, habit, Articles, regulations or decision the rule is not applicable, as far as this would be unacceptable with regard to the principles of reasonableness and fairness. This rather strong remedy – which is also known as limiting (or ‘derogatory’) effect of reasonableness and fairness – can, a.o., be invoked if it turns out that the Articles have a highly unreasonable effect on a party involved. Both the legal person and the parties involved can invoke the limiting effect.

Examples from case law

Case law shows that reasonableness and fairness will be applied differently by the courts:

(i) Required cooperation in shareholders’ agreement

A minority shareholder refuses to cooperate in changing a shareholders’ agreement with regard to financial restructuring. The desired funding will not take place so that the company is likely to go bankrupt. The court decides that the minority shareholder acts in breach with reasonableness and fairness, as the continuation of the business is in danger. In addition, by refusing to do so, the minority shareholder will succeed in obtaining a better position than the other shareholders. The minority shareholder is forced by the court to act in conformity with the modification in the shareholders agreement which he had refused.

(ii) Abrupt termination of membership

A furniture store is a member of an association. This association represents the interests of its members by acting as a joint purchasing group. The membership is terminated with immediate effect for a number of reasons. The court decides that the termination of the membership will have major consequences for the furniture store and was performed on improper grounds. Thus, the termination is in breach with reasonableness and fairness and therefore unlawful. The association has to pay the damage the furniture store has suffered as a consequence of the unlawful termination.

(iii) Annulment of a decision

Also, a decision can be annulled upon request of the legal person, an interested party or by the court if it is in breach of reasonableness and fairness (Book 2, Article 15 of the Dutch Civil Code). In such a case the court will have to assess if the body was able to come to the decision in reasonableness and fairness when assessing all interests involved in the decision. The Utrecht court decided in 2009 in interlocutory proceedings, for instance, that the directors of the foundation Karate-Do Bond Nederland could not have been able to decide in reasonableness and fairness on the delegation to the European Championships of one of their selection members, because another selection member had scored more points.

Action

  • When taking decisions, keep in mind the unreasonable/unfair consequences they might have.
  • Get legal advice in a timely manner, if in doubt whether a decision meets the requirements of reasonableness and fairness.

More information

Do you have any questions about the application of reasonableness and fairness in view of the unreasonable and/or unfair circumstances of your situation? Please contact:

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    An inclusive holiday policy

    The holiday season is approaching, a time of joy and days off for many. However, not everyone finds these holidays equally meaningful.

    Read more

    Right of inquiry: when is a request for an inquiry granted?

    Before the Enterprise Chamber can grant a request for an inquiry, there must be well-founded reasons to doubt the correct policy or course of events within a company. When is this the case?

    Read more

    Charity law

    In an article in the April 2024 issue of Lady Justice, the magazine of the Women Lawyers Section of Primerus, Lisanne Meijerhof shares her passion and expertise in charity law. Why has she chosen to focus on the law of foundations and other philanthropic organizations? What legal issues should charities be aware of?

    Read more

    Right of inquiry: who can file an inquiry request?

    When tensions run high within a company, potentially putting the company at risk, this may be a reason to go to the Enterprise Chamber to start inquiry proceedings. Who can exercise the right to file an inquiry request?

    Read more

    Statutory director: the good, the bad and the other leaver

    On the departure of a statutory director/shareholder, any participation in the company must also be settled. Then a discussion may arise about the value of this participation, depending on whether the director counts as a good leaver or bad leaver. What should companies and directors pay attention to when interpreting a leaver arrangement?

    Read more

    Right of inquiry: What are inquiry proceedings?

    Within a company, disputes regularly arise between shareholders and/or directors. This can create situations that endanger the company. To resolve such problems, inquiry proceedings were created in the Netherlands. What do these proceedings entail?

    Read more