Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Reasonableness and fairness play a crucial and special role in Dutch law. What function has this standard, for instance, for directors and supervisors?
Pursuant to Book 2, Section 8, subsection 1 of the Dutch Civil Code, a legal person (BV, NV, association, foundation, religious denomination) and those involved in any of these organisations must act according to the principles of reasonableness and fairness.
Reasonableness and fairness is not a concrete standard but will be filled in depending on the circumstances. These factors then play a role:
Reasonableness and fairness must be taken in into account by the legal person but also by those involved in the legal person, such as directors, shareholders, board of directors, members and works council (by virtue of law) and the supervisory board, depositary receipt holders and appointment committee (according to the Articles).
An important application of the standard is set out in Book 2, Article 8, subsection 2 of the Dutch Civil Code, according to which among the parties involved in legal persons by virtue of law, habit, Articles, regulations or decision the rule is not applicable, as far as this would be unacceptable with regard to the principles of reasonableness and fairness. This rather strong remedy – which is also known as limiting (or ‘derogatory’) effect of reasonableness and fairness – can, a.o., be invoked if it turns out that the Articles have a highly unreasonable effect on a party involved. Both the legal person and the parties involved can invoke the limiting effect.
Case law shows that reasonableness and fairness will be applied differently by the courts:
A minority shareholder refuses to cooperate in changing a shareholders’ agreement with regard to financial restructuring. The desired funding will not take place so that the company is likely to go bankrupt. The court decides that the minority shareholder acts in breach with reasonableness and fairness, as the continuation of the business is in danger. In addition, by refusing to do so, the minority shareholder will succeed in obtaining a better position than the other shareholders. The minority shareholder is forced by the court to act in conformity with the modification in the shareholders agreement which he had refused.
A furniture store is a member of an association. This association represents the interests of its members by acting as a joint purchasing group. The membership is terminated with immediate effect for a number of reasons. The court decides that the termination of the membership will have major consequences for the furniture store and was performed on improper grounds. Thus, the termination is in breach with reasonableness and fairness and therefore unlawful. The association has to pay the damage the furniture store has suffered as a consequence of the unlawful termination.
Also, a decision can be annulled upon request of the legal person, an interested party or by the court if it is in breach of reasonableness and fairness (Book 2, Article 15 of the Dutch Civil Code). In such a case the court will have to assess if the body was able to come to the decision in reasonableness and fairness when assessing all interests involved in the decision. The Utrecht court decided in 2009 in interlocutory proceedings, for instance, that the directors of the foundation Karate-Do Bond Nederland could not have been able to decide in reasonableness and fairness on the delegation to the European Championships of one of their selection members, because another selection member had scored more points.
Do you have any questions about the application of reasonableness and fairness in view of the unreasonable and/or unfair circumstances of your situation? Please contact:
An important part of corporate governance is compliance with the various rules governing the company. How do you ensure that your company becomes and stays compliant?
The shareholders’ agreement is the most important agreement entered into between shareholders and the company. What matters should you cover in this agreement?
It can have major consequences when a body within the company takes a decision it is not authorised to take. What are these consequences and how do you avoid making a decision in the wrong way?
In this blog, we give a brief overview of the main bodies present in limited companies and the powers they have.
A key advantage of inquiry proceedings is that that these allow the court to quickly make provisions to protect the company. What measures can the Enterprise Chamber take?
A dispute between shareholders can lead to problems within the company. In the case of a 50/50 shareholding, it may even make decision-making impossible and, in the worst case, threaten the survival of the company. How is such a dispute resolved?
