Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55A legal person is, in principle, represented by the management board. When are non-directors permitted to represent a legal person? What are the consequences of unauthorized representation?
A legal person has to be represented, for instance, to be able to conclude contracts, conduct legal proceedings, or to purchase or encumber real estate. Other parties than the directors (see our newsletter Good governance: Who’s liable – the legal entity or the directors?) may also represent the legal entity pursuant to the articles of association of the legal person or by granting authorisation.
The articles of association of the legal person (BV, NV, association, foundation) may grant authorisation of representation to other parties than the management board. In this case, a separate authorisation is not required. To create or change this kind of authorisation, the articles of association need to be changed however. As this can often be difficult, in practice, mostly the approach of authorisation is adopted.
The directors or the representatives under the articles of association can also confer their authority of representation to third parties by granting power of attorney. These parties become authorised persons (also referred to as proxy holders). The management board grants authorisation by means of a management decision. Preparing an authorisation requires a customized approach and the necessary expertise.
An authorisation can also be the (implicit) consequence of a certain position or appointment. Thus, a sales person has authority to conclude a sales contract with a client on behalf of the store.
The authority of representation of non-directors may be general or limited. By granting a general (‘full’) authority, the proxy holder is authorised to perform any legal acts in each area the grantor also holds authority for. The scope of the limited (‘special’) authority is determined by the articles of association or the text of the authority. An authority may thus be limited to transactions of a certain value (“up to EUR 50,000”) or to conduct certain transactions (“concluding leasing contracts”).
Authority – and its scope – can be registered in the Commercial Register of the Chamber of Commerce. The legal person is obliged to state its representatives under the articles of association. It is not required to register the proxy holders. However, it is advisable to do so as (possible) limitations of authority can only be enforced against third parties if het authority has been registered.
It may be the case that the counterparty is of the opinion to be dealing with a representative appointed by the legal person, whereas the person in question is not authorised. In principle, an unauthorised person cannot lawfully represent the legal person and a contract concluded with a pseudo-representative will not be binding on the legal person. Fooled!
If the legal person has contributed to creating an appearance of authority of representation (for instance, by allowing the pseudo-representative to take the lead in the negotiation of contracts, or by failing to give information about the scope of the authorisation), it may possible that the legal person will be bound by the contract nevertheless. This is the case when the counterparty on the grounds of facts and circumstances was entitled to rely on the pseudo-representative to be authorised.
Would you like to know more about power of attorney, authorisation and representation? Are you involved in a dispute with a counterparty that claims not to be bound by a contract concluded with you because it was concluded by a unauthorised person? Russell Advocaten will gladly assist you. Please contact:
The holiday season is approaching, a time of joy and days off for many. However, not everyone finds these holidays equally meaningful.
Wednesday 25 September 2024, Reinier Russell will discuss cybersecurity and data protection in litigation at the European meeting of the World Litigation Forum in Barcelona.
Before the Enterprise Chamber can grant a request for an inquiry, there must be well-founded reasons to doubt the correct policy or course of events within a company. When is this the case?
In an article in the April 2024 issue of Lady Justice, the magazine of the Women Lawyers Section of Primerus, Lisanne Meijerhof shares her passion and expertise in charity law. Why has she chosen to focus on the law of foundations and other philanthropic organizations? What legal issues should charities be aware of?
When tensions run high within a company, potentially putting the company at risk, this may be a reason to go to the Enterprise Chamber to start inquiry proceedings. Who can exercise the right to file an inquiry request?
On the departure of a statutory director/shareholder, any participation in the company must also be settled. Then a discussion may arise about the value of this participation, depending on whether the director counts as a good leaver or bad leaver. What should companies and directors pay attention to when interpreting a leaver arrangement?
