Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Oral agreements with the sole shareholder of a company can easily be annulled. For instance, already provided management reimbursement can be reclaimed. How can you prevent this from happening?
Companies are required to lay down activities with their sole shareholder in writing. Otherwise the sole shareholder risks that agreements concluded with the company can later be successfully annulled (mostly by the trustee in a bankruptcy). As a consequence, an already provided management reimbursement might have to be paid back.
A single-member company is a private limited company (BV) or public limited company (NV) with one shareholder. In actual practice, this shareholder is often a director. Then, the shareholder will be authorized to represent the company. In this case, it is tempting not to lay down in writing agreements made between the shareholder and the company as both parties are the same.
The legislator wants to prevent a sole shareholder from performing legal acts for his or her own benefit which are at the expense of the positon of creditors of the single-member company. Such as, for instance, debts of the sole shareholder remitted by the single-member company. To protect creditors, the law therefore prescribes that legal acts (mostly agreements) between the sole shareholder and the single-member company must be laid down in writing.
The main rule of written record does not apply to legal acts falling under “common professional practice”. To determine which legal acts do fall under this vague definition, it is not sufficient to take a look at the aim of the single-member company in the articles of association. Pursuant to the legislator this must relate to legal acts which were agreed upon on the “usual conditions”.
If there is no written record of the legal act, this act can be annulled for the benefit of the company. There are two possibilities, namely:
In practice, annulment is applied regularly by trustees of bankrupt single-member companies. For instance, The Hague District Court has decided recently, that an management agreement concluded verbally with the single shareholder was to be annulled.
An annulment has retroactive effect. This means – once a legal act has been annulled – this act is considered never to have existed. As a consequence, for instance, paid management remuneration(s), a remitted debt or a loan could (still) be reclaimed by the trustee from the single shareholder. If the agreement has been made in writing, the trustee can only reclaim the money if he or she can prove that the creditors were disadvantaged on purpose.
Would you like to know which legal acts should lay down in writing? Or do you have any other questions regarding corporate law and agreements? Please contact Russell Advocaten:
The franchise agreement and the distribution agreement are very similar, but there are also important differences. What are the consequences if you conclude a franchise agreement when it is actually a distribution agreement or vice versa? How can you avoid this misunderstanding?
On 1 July 2026, part of the transitional law of the Management and Supervision of Legal Entities Act (MSLEA) will expire. This mainly affects the voting rights of directors or supervisory directors of associations and foundations. When do you need to amend your articles of association?
An important part of corporate governance is compliance with the various rules governing the company. How do you ensure that your company becomes and stays compliant?
The shareholders’ agreement is the most important agreement entered into between shareholders and the company. What matters should you cover in this agreement?
It can have major consequences when a body within the company takes a decision it is not authorised to take. What are these consequences and how do you avoid making a decision in the wrong way?
In this blog, we give a brief overview of the main bodies present in limited companies and the powers they have.
