Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Oral agreements with the sole shareholder of a company can easily be annulled. For instance, already provided management reimbursement can be reclaimed. How can you prevent this from happening?
Companies are required to lay down activities with their sole shareholder in writing. Otherwise the sole shareholder risks that agreements concluded with the company can later be successfully annulled (mostly by the trustee in a bankruptcy). As a consequence, an already provided management reimbursement might have to be paid back.
A single-member company is a private limited company (BV) or public limited company (NV) with one shareholder. In actual practice, this shareholder is often a director. Then, the shareholder will be authorized to represent the company. In this case, it is tempting not to lay down in writing agreements made between the shareholder and the company as both parties are the same.
The legislator wants to prevent a sole shareholder from performing legal acts for his or her own benefit which are at the expense of the positon of creditors of the single-member company. Such as, for instance, debts of the sole shareholder remitted by the single-member company. To protect creditors, the law therefore prescribes that legal acts (mostly agreements) between the sole shareholder and the single-member company must be laid down in writing.
The main rule of written record does not apply to legal acts falling under “common professional practice”. To determine which legal acts do fall under this vague definition, it is not sufficient to take a look at the aim of the single-member company in the articles of association. Pursuant to the legislator this must relate to legal acts which were agreed upon on the “usual conditions”.
If there is no written record of the legal act, this act can be annulled for the benefit of the company. There are two possibilities, namely:
In practice, annulment is applied regularly by trustees of bankrupt single-member companies. For instance, The Hague District Court has decided recently, that an management agreement concluded verbally with the single shareholder was to be annulled.
An annulment has retroactive effect. This means – once a legal act has been annulled – this act is considered never to have existed. As a consequence, for instance, paid management remuneration(s), a remitted debt or a loan could (still) be reclaimed by the trustee from the single shareholder. If the agreement has been made in writing, the trustee can only reclaim the money if he or she can prove that the creditors were disadvantaged on purpose.
Would you like to know which legal acts should lay down in writing? Or do you have any other questions regarding corporate law and agreements? Please contact Russell Advocaten:
Before the Enterprise Chamber can grant a request for an inquiry, there must be well-founded reasons to doubt the correct policy or course of events within a company. When is this the case?
In an article in the April 2024 issue of Lady Justice, the magazine of the Women Lawyers Section of Primerus, Lisanne Meijerhof shares her passion and expertise in charity law. Why has she chosen to focus on the law of foundations and other philanthropic organizations? What legal issues should charities be aware of?
When tensions run high within a company, potentially putting the company at risk, this may be a reason to go to the Enterprise Chamber to start inquiry proceedings. Who can exercise the right to file an inquiry request?
On the departure of a statutory director/shareholder, any participation in the company must also be settled. Then a discussion may arise about the value of this participation, depending on whether the director counts as a good leaver or bad leaver. What should companies and directors pay attention to when interpreting a leaver arrangement?
Within a company, disputes regularly arise between shareholders and/or directors. This can create situations that endanger the company. To resolve such problems, inquiry proceedings were created in the Netherlands. What do these proceedings entail?
Expedited liquidation is a quick way to terminate a legal entity. However, the scheme was also abused, disadvantaging creditors. A new law should prevent this. What requirements does an expedited liquidation have to meet from now on? And what options do creditors have to collect their claims?
