Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55After concluding a contract, what are your options if your counterparty won’t deliver a product, delivers the product too late, delivers a wrong or defective product or does not fulfil the agreement in any other way?
If two parties conclude an agreement, they both assume that the agreement will be fulfilled and no problems will arise. However, often, one of the parties won’t deliver a product, delivers the product too late, delivers a wrong or defective product or does not fulfil the agreement in any other way. Then what?
If an agreement is not fulfilled as previously intended, under certain conditions, the agreement can be dissolved. What are these conditions?
This can be done by notifying the counterparty in writing that the agreement will be dissolved. If the dissolution is accepted, the agreement will be dissolved from then on. If the counterparty does not accept the dissolution, the court can be requested to render a decision on the dissolution.
After the dissolution, the parties have to re-establish the situation before they entered into the contract in the best possible way. All deliveries and payments have to be undone. If the buyer returns the purchase, the seller has to return the money. But what has to be returned exactly if the product cannot be returned or only be returned in deteriorated condition? Does the seller have to refund to the buyer the total purchase price?
In some cases the product cannot be returned by the buyer and an alternative compensation will have to be paid to the seller. Recently, a buyer of a motor boat intended to dissolve the agreement because the boat was defective. The court dissolved the agreement and ordered that the money had to be refunded to the buyer, but the court forgot to mention that the buyer had to return the boat. The seller requested a supplement to the decision but in the meantime the buyer had sold the boat. Returning the boat was therefore no longer possible. Ultimately, the Supreme Court decided that the buyer should have taken into account that he had to return the boat and therefore must pay alternative compensation. If this compensation is based on the value of the boat, the seller will receive less money than the amount he has to refund.
It may also be the case that returning a product is still possible but the product has been used by the buyer and was damaged or has otherwise become less valuable. This is what happened in online sale of mobile phones. Some providers offered all-inclusive mobile phone plans, without indicating the actual price of the cell phone. As this concerned an instalment purchase, the Supreme Court ordered that it was not permitted and the clients were allowed to dissolve the part of agreement that concerned the purchase of the phone. They were allowed to return the cell phone as it was at the time and got all their money back. The provider was not allowed to ask compensation for the use of the device.
Would you like to learn more about the conditions for dissolving an agreement or do you have any other questions about fulfilling contracts, please contact Russell Advocaten:
Expedited liquidation is a quick way to terminate a legal entity. However, the scheme was also abused, disadvantaging creditors. A new law should prevent this. What requirements does an expedited liquidation have to meet from now on? And what options do creditors have to collect their claims?
Entrepreneurs may have various reasons for ending their businesses. Expected profits may be disappointing, retirement may be approaching or a partnership (joint venture) may be ending. What should entrepreneurs bear in mind when terminating a business?
In principle, the enforcement of foreign judgments is a national matter. But what if a dispute has already been dealt with by a foreign court? Can such a foreign judgment be enforced in the Netherlands or not?
An African mask that was sold for 150 euros fetched 4.2 million euros at an auction. Were the French sellers able to undo the sale? How would this case have ended in the Netherlands?
An important way to prevent an assignment contract from turning out to be an employment contract after all is to use and correctly implement the model agreements on the website of the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration. However, from 1 January 2024, all models that partially or completely assume the possibility of substitution will expire. What does this mean for principals and contractors?
The WHOA makes it easier for a company facing bankruptcy to avoid bankruptcy. This can be done through a binding agreement with all creditors, even if they do not all agree to the arrangement. What rights do creditors have in WHOA proceedings?
