Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55A third party has to a certain degree of respect for the interests of others resulting from an existing agreement. A breach of this obligation could result in liability. Important considerations for the assessment of careless conduct of a third party are: the degree in which the breach of contract can be attributed to the third party and the scope of the interests of the contracting parties and others that are affected by the breach of contract.
Third parties have to pay a degree of respect regarding the interests of others in an existing agreement. If you, as a third party, induce one of the parties to a contract to non-performance or if you benefit thereof, breach of the obligation of respect may mean that you are liable. What is the obligation of respect exactly and when will there be a breach of this obligation?
One important principle of Dutch contract law is that parties must be able to rely on the fact that agreements will be met. The interest to maintain agreements results in the obligation of respect of third parties. A third party may be expected to show a certain degree of care with regard to respecting someone else’s agreements, This obligation of respect is not so extensive, however, that third parties can be limited in their competitive position and freedom to conduct their trade and business.
If A sells and delivers a car to C, while A had concluded a sales agreement with B regarding the same car at an earlier stage, this does not necessarily mean a breach of C’s obligation of respect. Simply concluding a conflicting contract does not mean a breach of the obligation of respect. This social duty of care is breached however if C knew of the sales agreement between A and B and C also encourages non-performance of A towards B by indemnifying A against future claims of B.
Negligent conduct regarding someone else’s agreements may lead to liability in tort. However, in the assessment whether there is negligent conduct, the court will take into account the following:
As a general rule: if the interests of other parties than the contracting parties are larger, it will sooner be assumed that the third party has committed a breach of the obligation of respect. On the other hand, the more the breach of contract or non-performance can be attributed to the conduct of a third party, the smaller the interest affected will have to be. Thus, the third party may also breach the obligation of respect by encouraging termination of a terminable continuing performance agreement, if coercion or deception is involved.
The circumstances always have to be considered together. It is in principle allowed to contact someone else’s customers to terminate their existing contracts but it could result in a breach of the obligation of respect if one of the contracting parties has made a major investment of time and money which is protected by the contracts. This can include, for instance, a contractor who has bought special equipment for a project or a franchisee who invested a lot of money to adapt a building.
As a third party, make sure to take into account the existing contracts of someone else and the interests involved. In the event of one of the aforementioned circumstances, you are well advised to pay extra care to prevent a breach of your obligation of respect. If you fail to do so you might be liable.
Would you like to learn more about the obligation of respect? Or you have any other questions about duties arising from contracts? Please contact us:
This is one of the most common questions we are asked by entrepreneurs. The question is obvious, as liability for damage can lead to high compensation payments. So is it possible to exclude liability completely, or can it merely be limited? And what measures do you have to take to do so?
In the Netherlands, parties have great freedom of contract. Thus, the parties can also contract under (suspensive or resolutive) conditions. What does this mean and what do you have to look out for?
The franchise agreement and the distribution agreement are very similar, but there are also important differences. What are the consequences if you conclude a franchise agreement when it is actually a distribution agreement or vice versa? How can you avoid this misunderstanding?
With the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration again enforcing the Deregulation of Assessment of Employment Relationships Act (DBA Act), these questions have become even more important. In a recent ruling on Uber drivers, the Supreme Court provided additional guidance on how to determine whether someone is a self-employed person.
An important part of corporate governance is compliance with the various rules governing the company. How do you ensure that your company becomes and stays compliant?
The shareholders’ agreement is the most important agreement entered into between shareholders and the company. What matters should you cover in this agreement?