Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Arbitration is a less well-known but effective way of dispute resolution. In the following we will therefore list 7 things you should know about arbitration.
Arbitration is non-public administration of justice. The parties can agree mutually not to submit a dispute to the regular court but to one or more arbitrators. This can be done before a dispute has arisen, for instance, in General Terms & Conditions, or when a dispute has arisen, in a specific agreement.
Arbitration also offers outcomes in international and commercial disputes. Thus, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague has recently rendered a decision on a dispute between Russia and the shareholders of a nationalized Russian oil company. The Russian government has to pay back 50 billion USD (EUR 37.2 billion) to the shareholders.
In arbitration proceedings the parties can agree on many things beforehand, whereas the regular court is bound by the statutory rules of procedure. Thus, agreements can be made on the number of arbitrators and the language used in the proceedings. The parties can also decide on the arbitral rules to be applied and before which institute the proceedings have to be held, for instance, the Netherlands Arbitration Institute (Nederlands Arbitrage Instituut, NAI), the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) or the Court of Arbitration for the Building Industry in the Netherlands (Raad van Arbitrage voor de Bouw, RvA). If a dispute is submitted to the institute of choice, the parties themselves may appoint the arbitrators.
Arbitrators are usually lawyers and/or specialists from the sector. They have the same legal authority as a judge and, in addition, have thorough professional expertise. This extra knowledge ensures that the parties can clarify their (legal) problem more easily and will more easily agree with a decision afterwards. A regular judge often has to appoint a specialist in order make a proper assessment of what is going on, which involves additional costs.
Arbitration proceedings are less formal, and therefore they are usually shorter than court proceedings. Arbitrators are not bound by the strict rules the regular court is bound by. The focus is on oral hearings and therefore the parties get the chance to have their say.
A dispute which is settled by arbitration will be treated more confidential than a dispute before a regular court which, in principle, has to treat disputes in public. Therefore, outsiders will not be able to find out easily that certain parties have a dispute and neither can they attend meetings.
A decision by arbitrators has the same legal effect as a ruling by a regular court. Another benefit is that an arbitral award can be enforced in about 150 countries across the world, whereas a ruling by a Dutch court can only be enforced outside the EU if there is a treaty on the enforcement of judgments between the Netherlands and the country in question, which often is not the case.
Would you like to know more about arbitration? Would you like to include an arbitration clause in your General Terms & Conditions? Or would you like to start arbitration proceedings? Please contact:
Reinier W.L. Russell, LL.M. (reinier.russell@russell.nl).
Wednesday 25 September 2024, Reinier Russell will discuss cybersecurity and data protection in litigation at the European meeting of the World Litigation Forum in Barcelona.
Before the Enterprise Chamber can grant a request for an inquiry, there must be well-founded reasons to doubt the correct policy or course of events within a company. When is this the case?
When tensions run high within a company, potentially putting the company at risk, this may be a reason to go to the Enterprise Chamber to start inquiry proceedings. Who can exercise the right to file an inquiry request?
Within a company, disputes regularly arise between shareholders and/or directors. This can create situations that endanger the company. To resolve such problems, inquiry proceedings were created in the Netherlands. What do these proceedings entail?
Expedited liquidation is a quick way to terminate a legal entity. However, the scheme was also abused, disadvantaging creditors. A new law should prevent this. What requirements does an expedited liquidation have to meet from now on? And what options do creditors have to collect their claims?
It is possible that proceedings have been started in the Netherlands, but also abroad on the same subject. Is that allowed? Does one of the proceedings have precedence over the other?