Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55In the event of a conflict, shareholders may demand that a co-shareholder be compulsorily required to transfer his shares, also referred to as a buy-out. When is this forced transfer of shares allowed and how should it be arranged?
In the event of a conflict, a shareholder may significantly impede the company by blocking the adoption of decisions by the shareholders’ meeting, for instance, on a takeover or applying for a major loan necessary for the continuation or expansion of the company. In such cases the other shareholders can claim in court that the shareholder blocking the decision-making process has to transfer his shares. Shareholders can only institute such proceedings if they hold at least one third of the company shares.
The functioning of the company must be jeopardized if there is to be a good reason for a forced transfer of shares. There does not need to be a risk of the company going under. However, there must be a structural deadlock in the company’s decision-making process. Such as, for instance, a shareholder who deliberately obstructs decisions, which may have major consequences for the company. If the articles of association of a company contain a regulation for the resolution of conflicts between shareholders, this path has to be followed first.
Misconduct on the part of the shareholder which has nothing to do with the performance of his function as a shareholder cannot result in a forced transfer of shares in the squeeze-out procedure. Even if the conduct is detrimental to the reputation of the company, but not directly related to the functioning of the shareholder within the company, it will usually not result in a successful squeeze-out procedure.
If the court grants the claim to forced sale of the shares, the price of the shares must be determined. The starting point here is the value at the time the decision becomes irrevocable. The court will be advised by experts with regard to the determination of the price. This may take some time. A squeeze-out procedure does therefore not offer a quick solution to a conflict, but is a big stick in negotiations with shareholders.
Do you have a conflict with one of your co-shareholders? Does the co-shareholder act detrimental to the company? We will be happy to assist you with legal advice and, if necessary, legal proceedings to achieve a transfer of shares. Please contact us:
The majority shareholder and the board turn the company into an empty shell. How can you as a minority shareholder defend yourself against decisions that are detrimental to you?
The franchise agreement and the distribution agreement are very similar, but there are also important differences. What are the consequences if you conclude a franchise agreement when it is actually a distribution agreement or vice versa? How can you avoid this misunderstanding?
On 1 July 2026, part of the transitional law of the Management and Supervision of Legal Entities Act (MSLEA) will expire. This mainly affects the voting rights of directors or supervisory directors of associations and foundations. When do you need to amend your articles of association?
An important part of corporate governance is compliance with the various rules governing the company. How do you ensure that your company becomes and stays compliant?
The shareholders’ agreement is the most important agreement entered into between shareholders and the company. What matters should you cover in this agreement?
It can have major consequences when a body within the company takes a decision it is not authorised to take. What are these consequences and how do you avoid making a decision in the wrong way?
